The ZX2 is 200-250 lbs. lighter than the ZX3 and the MTX has slightly better gearing for acceleration. The exhaust VCT in the ZX2, Cougar and '99-'00 Contour Zetec engines is primarily for emissions and for economy. It does, however, allow the use of longer duration cams in a stock emissions legal engine.
ZX2 intake: 214 deg @ 0.050", 0.366" lift
ZX3 intake: 206 deg @ 0.050", 0.353" lift
ZX2 exhaust 211 deg @ 0.050", 0.338" lift
ZX3 exhaust 205 deg @ 0.050", 0.342" lift
The VCT is under PCM control, advancing the exhaust cam up to 60 deg. anytime the throttle is opened wider than idle and the engine is above idle. At some points the cam is fully advanced allowing exhaust gases to mix with the intake charge. At other points, the cam is partially advanced increasing power at high rpm.
The improvement in midband is partly due to the longer duration and higher lift of the intake cam, and partly due to more aggressive (relative to the non-VCT Zetec) fuel and ignition maps from 2000-4000 rpm. The changeover in the 3500-4000 rpm range is real as the engine shifts from emissions/economy mode to power mode if the engine is revved at WOT.
In general, the non-VCT Zetec in the Focus makes more torque in the 3000-5000 rpm range than the ZX2 engine. With cams, head work and exhaust the Focus Zetec is easier to work on and is a screamer.
The one exception is the engine in the federal ZX2 S/R with the federal PCM code, CWQ3. The S/R used a stock ZX2 engine but equipped with an Iceman intake, Borla muffler and the Ford racing PCM.
This S/R engine was rated at 146 HP and 140 ft-lb of torque and makes consdirably nmore torque from 2000-4000 rpm than any of the other 2.0 liter Zetecs, except for the SVT engine (170 HP, 145 ft-lb torque)
Interesting that the CWQ3 engine does not show the switchover at 4000 rpm, mostly because it is making more torque in the 2200-4000 rpm band, and keeps making torque up to 5000 rpm where the stock engine starts to roll off.
[ 05-20-2003, 07:29 AM: Message edited by: JohnsZX2SR ]