Ford Focus Forum banner
1 - 20 of 27 Posts

HuntinCooter

· Registered
Joined
·
2,004 Posts
Discussion starter · #1 ·
I plan on getting an exhaust in the next few weeks. I wan't a fairly cheep 2.5" that eliminates the second cat. Can someone please direct me to the right place? Thanks
Image
 
The Borla at Draxas is $400. The other option would be to get a true bendz and have a custom peace added to remove the second cat.
 
Personally, I think once people start getting stuff like P&P heads, custom intake manifolds, cams, race headers, etc... all at once on their 2.3's, your going to see a need for 2.5" cat backs. It's a bigger engine, it's need's to breath better, right?

If it were me I'd start with a 2.5" just to avoid having to get it in the future if you find out it's worth a few lb/ft over the 2.25" ones.
 
exactly^^^^

truth is with all that torque you're making downlow, the tradeoff means jack in the end. I doubt you'd find even a deadstock PZEV suffering w/ torque loss.

by the time you've got I/E (not even headers, let alone cam, etc) you're prolly gonna get a significatn gain out of a 2.5 versus a 2.25
 
And a shop can't mendral bend the pipe.
We have several local shops that have a mandrel machine up here.
As far as the 2.5" vs. the 2.25" Over at the NASIOC (soob site) the best performance was by using a 2.25" on ALL Naturally Asperated engines. I know that this isn't a 2.5L flat 4 boxer engine that is producing 165 hp and 167 torque from the factory, then add headers, intake, and port and polish and you will be ~200 crank hp. Slightly more than the 2.3L.
If you are going to go forced induction then go 2.5"
Just for some reference the WRX and the STi both run a 2.5" from the factory, in case you forgot...the STi is around a 300hp/300torque engine.
 
^^^^^

Great information!

Image
indeed, i had no idea cars were going that high HP NA with a 2.25
 
And a shop can't mendral bend the pipe.
We have several local shops that have a mandrel machine up here.
As far as the 2.5" vs. the 2.25" Over at the NASIOC (soob site) the best performance was by using a 2.25" on ALL Naturally Asperated engines. I know that this isn't a 2.5L flat 4 boxer engine that is producing 165 hp and 167 torque from the factory, then add headers, intake, and port and polish and you will be ~200 crank hp. Slightly more than the 2.3L.
If you are going to go forced induction then go 2.5"
Just for some reference the WRX and the STi both run a 2.5" from the factory, in case you forgot...the STi is around a 300hp/300torque engine.
Exactly 2.25 is plenty for this little motor. I think it's funny on the 2.0 everyone ran away from the 2.5 inch and on the 2.3 (which is only 300cc's more mind you) every wants 2.5inches. 2.25 is a pretty well accepted exhaust size for n/a sub 3L 4 cylinder engines.
 
1 - 20 of 27 Posts