Lifeguardjoe said:
Only when they're directly stealing trademarked logos and such WITH intent to make a profit.
Ford's gone after some pretty petty causes. For example, when I had my powerstroke years ago, I belonged to an enthusiast site called FordDiesel.com. Ford went after them and they had to change the name to "TheDieselStop.com". That's pretty lame in my book.
Johnny_P said:
I don't care if he's regarded as one of the greatest enthusiasts/tuners of all time... this guy is a dick. I think Ford should pull all of the Shelby stuff off the shelf and never use his name again on anything, that's what I'd do at least. I mean, all they're using his name for anymore is the name... and they could come up with a new performance name pretty easily.
That and he's losing a lot of respect in the automotive world for this bs....
Ford won't dump Shelby, they are heavily involved with them, and the name is legendary. There are a zillion more people who don't know "the truth" about Carroll like the core enthusiasts do, and that's what Ford counts on.
FORDSVTPARTS said:
I didn't read the whole article, I was reffering to the original Cobra.
That was an A.C. design, even the chassis plates showed the A.C. manufactured in England.
Pete Brock worked for Shelby and designed the Daytona coupe, theres no arguing that but it's a 40 year old car with hand built bodywork and no two coupes were the same.
Shelby is just a little too greedy if you ask me.
I wouldn't quite say AC "designed" the Cobra. AC had a neat little car, of which they lost their engine contract. Carroll was looking for a small british handler to stuff an American V8 into (let's not forget he went to GM before Ford and was turned down). SHELBY created and built the first Cobras. AC supplied the roller and Shelby built the car. The big block cars were designed by Ford. It was actually the first car that Ford had ever used computers to design. Ford and Shelby contracted AC to build the big block cars to these new specs.
As for the coupes, yes, Peter designed the coupes, however he was working for Shelby so technically they are Shelby's design. Suing over the coupe shape from a legal standpoint sounds fine to most, however the only REASON for the lawsuit NOW, is that Carroll is selling his own Coupes. He hasn't cared in 40 years. Now he does, because of his pockets.
shlbygt said:
Superformance has a license from Shelby to build and sell their Cobra and Daytona Coupe. If Shelby does not enforce his trademarks then Superformance has the right to sue Shelby for not protecting the licensee rights of Superformance.
Shelby sued SAAC because Ken Eber is an arrogant idiot who did not fullfill contractual obligations as per his licesning agreement with Shelby. Part of the SAAC settlement required Eber to step down as a director.
SVTOA kicked Eber to the curb after less than a year of him in charge because he is did nothing for the club but take money from members. Now the New Jersey Motorsports Park is sueing Eber and SAAC because of a dine and dash that was known as the SAAC 33 convention.
http://www.thedailyjournal.com/article/20081216/NEWS01/812160306/1002/rs
If you look at the side bar on the article note that it states "Shelby's" bill. Which one could infer that Carroll Shelby owes money to NJMP and not Eber. Would you want your name to be associated with a club that walks out on a $115,000 bill.
Spoken like a true TS enthusiast

. Superformance is licensed to use the Cobra emblem on their cars and call them Cobras. That's about it. The only reason why, is they opened their wallet to the old man. Carroll has gone after SPF in the past as well. And he does not endorse the Brock Coupe, just the roadsters. The Brock Coupe (as it's called) may LOOK like an original coupe, but the Peter redesigned the shape of the car for SPF so this version is a bit different from the originals. Oh, and if you ever see any recent interviews with Carroll, he usually doesn't even mention Peter Brock when talking about the coupes. Carroll likes to re-write history as he goes along
blueovaldave said:
If i recall correctly Shelby and his crew had everything to do with the new Cobras. They took a couple of cars and worked on the designs for the add on stuff, ect.
All the Mustangs in the 70's were sent to the Shelby shop to be "worked up" and then sent to dealers from there.
Shelby had nothing to do with the design of the new GT500 (it's not a "cobra"). The car was entirely Ford. All the other current Shelbys ARE actually modified by Shelby in Las Vegas just like the old days. And Shelby builds the KR and does the SuperSnake GT500 conversions in Vegas as well.
Oh, and it was the 60s, not the 70s

.
FORDSVTPARTS said:
I've actually got the original parts catalogs for the 289 and 427 Cobras that I rescued from the trash bin a few years ago.
Soooo, when are you going to send me those
The bottom line here, is this is classic Carroll. This is nothing new. From day one, Carroll has been a cut throat salesman. The very first Cobra (CSX2000) was painted 3 different colors to trick the media into thinking Carroll had an operation production of running cars. On the 427 street cars, Carroll started putting 428s in them with 427 valve covers and didn't tell anyone. In the 90s, Carroll claimed he had "leftover" chassis from the 60s, "finished" those cars, and then sold them for 500k each. The truth was he hired Mike McCluskey (famous Cobra restorer) to build them from scratch. Of course, the feds caught the old coot on that one.
Don't get me wrong... I will forever be greatful to Carroll for creating the greatest automotive icon of all time. That can never be taken away. What he did in the 50s as a driver, and the 60s as a manufacturer, is legendary history. But it doesn't change who he is, and you can't fool people in this day and age anymore.