Ford Focus Forum banner

2.3L (87.5mm) and 2.5L (92mm) Duratec Short Block Assembly

32K views 44 replies 23 participants last post by  aerostudent  
#1 ·
With the 2.0L and 2.3L Duratec I-4 engine finally reaching mainstream performance enthusiast acceptance, the demand for serious performance components is finally reaching the potential we have believed it would over 3 years ago when this engine debuted in the Focus. 2006 is the fourth year of Duratec production, and the first year in which every major component needed to build a truly high performance Duratec engine is available.

The short blocks described here offer improved strength out of the box, and an option of increased displacement to 2.0L and 2.3L Duratec owners at a reasonable cost. For our stock displacement engines, standard bore core blocks and crankshafts are disassembled, measured, and re-machined as required to accept new connecting rods and pistons. Our 92mm Big-Bore short blocks begin much the same way, but are sent to the boring machine to have their original 87.5mm sleeves removed and replaced with 92mm sleeves. Before assembly, the crankshafts are balanced internally, and the pistons, rings, rods, and bearings are weight matched. In addition, all measurements are checked on each component and all critical measurements are adjusted through matching the individual components or re-machining. Each engine comes with a complete spec sheet and build certificate.

Engine Features:
Remanufactured Focus 2.3L Duratec Cylinder Block, Standard 87.5mm (or Sleeved to 92mm on 2.5L version)
Remanufactured Focus 2.3L Duratec Crankshaft, De-Burred, Stress Relieved, (Ranger Spec Crankshaft Standard on 2.5L version)
Balance Shaft Assembly Removed and Balance Shaft Delete Kit Installed
Supertech Forged Pistons w/NPR Piston Rings (Specific 92mm piston skirt design for reduced ring pack wear on 2.5L version)
Eagle Connecting Rods
New Cosworth Heavy Duty Replacement Bearings
90 Day Warranty On Parts

Each engine is built to suit an individual customer's application, and as a result, this part must be ordered by phone. For this reason, please allow 6-8 weeks for delivery.

Note to potential engine consumers about increasing displacement in the Duratec engine:

Marcy Motorsport has been involved with the Duratec engine for over 3 years now, and during this time we have had the opportunity to fully research and test products for this engine at greater length than most of our competitors. We have found through research and testing that it is possible to exceed 2500cc with the Duratec, but the resulting engine becomes a series of compromises in design and longevity. Increasing the displacement to 2600cc, even 2700cc is possible, but the piston and rod combination becomes unreliable with poor rod angles and extreme angular loads on the piston skirts. As well as excessive piston speeds, excessive wear to the cylinder walls, piston skirts, and ring package will result from large displacement combinations. Combinations exceeding 2500cc should only be considered for track use, and then only by individuals willing to accept the short lifespan and potential for design related failure.

2.3L Short Blocks start at $1699 with core exchange or $1999 outright
2.5L Short Blocks start at $2599 with core exchange or $2899 outright

Options include:
Ranger Crankshaft on 2.3L
Cosworth Forged Pistons for 2.3L
Cosworth Connecting Rods for 2.3L or 2.5L
Ultra-Lite Profiled and Cryoed Ranger Crankshaft for 2.3L or 2.5L
Cosworth Billet Crankshaft for 2.3L or 2.5L
Darton Sleeves on 2.5L

Additional pricing and details can be found on our website.
 
#4 ·
Now I know squat about engines, but 2.5L makes me want one. Now for my daily stupid question:

Are there any issues with attempting to use a 2.5L block on a daily driver?
 
#5 ·
mievil said:
Are there any issues with attempting to use a 2.5L block on a daily driver?

The 238 cubic centimeter increase in total cylinder volume (or from 2261cc to 2499cc's engine displacement) is achieved solely through a 4.5mm diameter increase in piston diameter/ bore size. There is no change in stroke.

Though the torque increase may not be quite the same as what you might feel with a stroke increase, the 238cc tune-up will most certainly be noticeable as a big increase in general 'grunt'.

In other words, though not inexpensive, this would bring a smile to all Duratec drivers, especially with slightly bigger cams (if one desires a milder combo).

There should be no problems with this engine in service as a daily driver if the compression and cams are kept mild (as with any engine).

I can't wait to try it. Unfortunately, I do not know when that will be...
 
#8 ·
how many miles could one expect to see, in a rough estimate, out of a 2.5 daily driver?

and what kinda horsepower out of the box?
 
#9 ·
I'm sure Marcy Motorsport has considered block cooling compromises if there are any at all.

There should be no adverse effects from an increase in bore regarding longevity; nothing changes in the rod/stroke ratio.

As for a power increase, look for 15 HP (if similar valve events in relation to stock cylinder volume can be achieved) with a similar increase in torque.

There should be big differences in power and torque just from playing with the cam centerline timing, let alone longer off-the-seat valve events. :p

Think about the difference between the 2.0 and 2.3 Duratecs; not counting the stroke and rod length differences, it's a 263cc (what's the cc on the 2.0? 1998?) addition with the 2.3 (2261cc's). Add yet another 238 cc's... :eek:

Please correct me if I'm in error. ;)
 
#11 ·
11.5:1 Compression and 2.5L displacement alone would net about 22hp to a completely stock 2.3L. With the same exact performance induction, ported head, larger cams, and performance exhaust, the difference between the stock 2.3L and the 2.5L would be about 30hp.

My current combination is going together at 12.5:1, and with the fully ported head, Stage 4 cams, 52mm ITBs and a revised exhaust, I'm expecting to be up 40-50hp over my old combination.

As far as cooling goes, it will not pose a problem. I tested removal of the stock thermostat on the 2.3L and altered the fan settings in the ECU and was able to run the engine as much as 40 degrees cooler than stock under hard load. The stock cooling system is more than capable of handling this combination.

For sealing purposes, Cometic makes an MLS gasket specifically for a 92mm bore Duratec. This gasket is much like the stock gasket with layered steel, coated with a sealant around coolant and oil passages. So far these gaskets have proven to work exactly as the stock piece.

Finally, it would be very reasonable to expect the 2.5L to last 100,000 miles. An important factor in this is that we are not altering the connecting rod or crankshaft dimensions to increase the displacement, thus keeping proven engineering in place and preventing unnecessary wear by way of altered rod angles and excessive piston speeds. Additionally, the piston design has been tailored specifically to this bore size to provide piston and ring life that will easily rival stock. And because the components are improved throughout, and not just in one area, with coated pistons, special rings, stronger rods and vastly superior bearings, the engine will easily handle an agressive driver over an extended period.
 
#13 ·
Well, assuming you are going to run the Duratec in pace of your SVO's Lima 2.3, sure. The plan is to offer 12.5:1, 11.0:1 and 9.5:1 compression. I wouldn't hesitate to run 20psi on a 9.5:1 setup BTW.
 
#16 ·
MarcyMotorsport said:
Our 92mm Big-Bore short blocks begin much the same way, but are sent to the boring machine to have their original 87.5mm sleeves removed and replaced with 92mm sleeves.
Are the new sleeves the same wall thickness? I assume that when the original sleeves are removed, additional material must also be bored out of the aluminum block to allow the larger replacement sleeves to fit.
 
#18 ·
I see no reason why it couldn't be used in a Mazda 3, unless there are any differences in mounting points on the clylinder blocks from Mazda. Of course, if we use a Mazda core block, then it would be guaranteed to work. I just haven't had an opportunity to compart the two blocks side by side.
 
#23 ·
You're not likely to get more than 100,000 miles from any car with an aftermarket forced induction system. The devlopment in the aftermarket isn't quite the same as at the OE level. Aftermarket suppliers usualy do not have access to the same testing facilities to do durability testing procedures as OEs do. You'd likely do much better with one of these short blocks than your stock one though. The biggest factor would be the boost level you want to run. At 7-8psi, with a lightly ported head, stage 1 cams and a good inlet manifold, this setup would be very reliable and make about 300-325whp reliably. As long as you perform regular maintenance, and drive the car with some degree of self restraint it will be fine, but if you live for the Stop Light Grand Prix, all bets about longevity are off.
 
#25 ·
carter21 said:
Would a lightly ported head be one of the short blocks?
A short block, by definition, doesn't include a head. I'm not sure if MM offers a ported head yet, but you could try to find an experienced machine/speed shop nearby and have them do it.
 
#26 ·
I will be making an announcement on cylinder heads and head packages mid-late February. No the cylinder head is not included with the short block.