[SilverSVT]

um its different looking...no sure if I like it or not

 

[Rally Man]

Originally posted by focusdchaos:
At least it is a hatchback.

<font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">It looks more like a wagon then a hatch.

Originally posted by SilverSVT:
um its different looking...no sure if I like it or not

<font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">How bout I make the decision for you, don't like it!

[ 04-15-2003, 01:15 PM: Message edited by: Rally Man ]

 

[focusdchaos]

That is what it should have looked like.

 

[Rally Man]

MUCH BETTER!

To bad, why do US companies do this to us?

 

[focusdchaos]

I knew that hatch looked familiar. 2000 Chevy Traverse concept. The concept rode on a truck platform though, instead of the Vectra platform.

 

[hatched]

I think it already look dated – sort of mid-to-late 1980s. Kind look like this:

That's a 1984 Toyota Camry. I don't know – maybe it's just me.

[ 04-15-2003, 01:44 PM: Message edited by: hatched ]

 

[dpsilversvt]

it's a chevy

 

[wrcfocus]

The side profile looks like an IS300 Sportcross, not a fan of that style tho.. but atleast we're see hatchbacks making a comeback!

 

[darkness]

Hmmm...I actually like it. Certainly looks better than the regular Malibu.

 

[svtfocuspower]

The styling is absolutly horrid

 

[ZedX31485]

^^Thats GM for ya.....

 

[THEDANT21]

AHH, quick, someone Photochop some superleggras and a drop on it, its burning my eyyyessss

 

[SVTkc]

It DOES look better than the new standard Malibu, which has styling cues reminiscent of the Chrysler K-cars of the early 80s.

Fugly front end though, you'd think it belonged on the Silverado. Actually now that I think about it, the Silverado looks BETTER than this.

Since it's being built at Fairfax (KC, KS) I feel bad for my fellow KC residents whose job will be in peril if this thing doesn't sell....I had an Intrigue from there a few years ago and the build quality was excellent. They deserve a better product.....

 

[focusdchaos]

At least it is a hatchback.