Ford Focus Forum banner

Focus ST exhaust manifold on 2.0 PZEV = WooHoo!

5K views 43 replies 18 participants last post by  brandon0133  
#1 ·
I recently aquired the stock exhaust header from a Focus ST (thank you OmniFocus), and last week, went to work installing it on my 2.0 pzev. I know there has been a lot of talk as to whether or not this would deliver much performance gains. Let me settle the debate.. . yes, it does. I couldn't believe how much power I had gained when I got out on the road with it. I dont have a dyno, so no solid numbers, but performance has increased substantially at all rpm's. Most of all though at low rpm's and on hill climbs. Looking at my attached photo comparing the two manifolds, it's easy to see why.




Things you need to know if you would like to try this too:

- Haynes manuel will say you have to remove all sorts of stuff to get the stock manifold off a pzev. Even with the huge pzev manifold and an ATX (engine sits back 1" further), I was able to remove the manifold without removing any engine accessories. Only thing I unscrewed and moved out of the way was the device attached to the fuel line directly above the manifold. Getting the st manifold in was even easier. You can do this!

-You will need an exhaust gasket off of a non-pzev car. The pzev gasket has indentations allowing clean air to be injected into the exhaust stream. With the ST manifold, these indentations create exhaust leaks.

-You will now have only two of the three o2 sensors your ECU is looking for, so you will need an SCT tune, or a Steeda square port o2 cheater.

-The pzev manifold does a lot to quiet down the exhaust. I have a trubendz 2.5" flex back, and after bolting on the st header, I had to have another muffler welded in to bring the car back down to what I consider a reasonable level. The extra muffler did not hurt performance.

If anyone is considering this job and wants more photo's/info, let me know!

Very Pleased!
 
#27 ·
"Emissions legal" is the wrong way to look at this. "Emissions legal enough" is more appropriate. Having an ST header on any duratec focus should easily be emissions legal enough for all 50 states I'd think.
 
#28 ·
...there should be no reason you wouldnt pass emissiions.
What state do you live in?

'Cause that won't happen in California; I can almost guarantee it. One of the reasons (as I've said in Duratec Tuning before) for our 6-year interval to our PZEV's first "smog check" is so that emissions-testing techs can receive the proper training and education on what constitutes a PZEV, all the way down to the number of O2 sensors and the dimensions of the primary and secondary catalysts.

I still think it's a cool swap, though; kinda factory-like. Just not emissions-legal technically.
 
#29 ·
:what: They'd REALLY be in there with a ruler measuring your cat? And counting O2 sensors??!! :eek:
 
#30 ·
Counting O2s? More than likely. These techs and the entire emissions-testing apparatus here in California is no longer a laughing matter. It is no joke, unfortunately, though the severity of these emsiions standards may appear to be.

And as one can tell from the pics one won't need a ruler to note the differences between the PZEV "manicat" and the D20's manifold/catalyst.

*sigh*

At least we can all actually breathe out here in L.A. city traffic.
 
#33 ·
Z63R, what would you think about swapping in an ST header & then putting the heat shield back on? Those guys would have to jack up your car & crawl under it to count O2 sensors then.
 
#34 ·
What about the air injection tube?

Even if you fooled them on the visual, once these guys sniff a few stock PZEVs, a modified one will stand out due to it's increased HC, CO2, NOX and CO... however slight.

You're welcome to try, though. :thumbup:
 
#36 ·
Z63R said:
You're welcome to try, though. :thumbup:
Won't have to in MD.:cool: But you make good points.
 
#38 ·
Z63R said:
What state do you live in?

'Cause that won't happen in California; I can almost guarantee it. One of the reasons (as I've said in Duratec Tuning before) for our 6-year interval to our PZEV's first "smog check" is so that emissions-testing techs can receive the proper training and education on what constitutes a PZEV, all the way down to the number of O2 sensors and the dimensions of the primary and secondary catalysts.

I still think it's a cool swap, though; kinda factory-like. Just not emissions-legal technically.
heh I live in Texas, I can run open header in a fully built race car up and down the streets.

Pfft on a sidenote, if your modding your car to stay legal, you're in the wrong business! :hump:
 
#39 ·
2007Zx3

heh I live in Texas, I can run open header in a fully built race car up and down the streets.
That's nice, but if the car is not registered for highway use, that's not legal either.




Pfft on a sidenote, if your modding your car to stay legal, you're in the wrong business! :hump:
Yeah.

We're all idiots and you're not.



Get it through your thick head: Modifying emissions equipment is illegal on a federal level.

Of course, you're free to do whatever you want. If you live in a testing-lenient state, so be it. As a moderator of this particular forum here on [FJ], I'm here, among other things, to remind you that tampering with your new car's emissions equipment is, again, a federal violation regardless of where in the U.S. you happen to reside unless said vehicle is resgistered for off-highway use only.
 
#41 ·
jlhansen said:
^^^
Yeah, well I think he's just trying to rub in anyway. CA is good in lots of ways: uh, and there's, uh. :)
Well, for one, it's not Texas. :lol:

Everyone is constantly talking trash about how stupid California is for having all these regulations on emissions...yet the fail to realize that California is always the "first one" to do it. Note "first one" and not "only one." It's going to happen all over the United States, and I don't see why everyone is so gun-ho about how stupid it is. It means cleaner air by way of lower nasty emissions. (Hehe...emission)

I give it 5 years, no more than 12 before 90% of the United States has same or similar emission laws.
 
#42 ·
Chalz, my comments were "tongue in cheek." I don't like the congestion or the taxes, but it's home. America is full of border wars and they're mostly good-natured.

I totally agree that the smog battle is important and has yielded astounding results in L. A. In the 60s it was horrible. It's just tough to reconcile the need for speed with the need for legality and clean air.
 
#43 ·
Chalz said:
I give it 5 years, no more than 12 before 90% of the United States has same or similar emission laws.
I can accept stricter emissions standards, and they are inevitable, but I don't think all of CARB's policies will translate directly to other states. For one, they make it prohibitively expensive to produce a "street legal" engine part, whether or not it is emissions-related. I would fully accept strict emissions laws, as long as they dealt only with emissions, and not products which lawmakers think might cause emissions.

Cool cars, cool guns... California doesn't want you to have any neat toys. ;)