Ford Focus Forum banner

Status
Not open for further replies.
1 - 20 of 21 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,586 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
SVT
Jrsc with 3" pulley (not a good tune yet) peaks about 10psi

on my autoguage

what do you think it moved my HP and lbT to as a rough est
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,615 Posts
Depending on the how conservative the tune 205 to 215WHP and 165 to 175 TQ at the wheels.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,838 Posts
200/170
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,586 Posts
Discussion Starter #5
sounds ok for a guesstimate, it feels good so well see once i learn to tune better.

I def feel more torque esp when it hits 4k
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
1,109 Posts
low ball idiots. (rick/nick)

The truth
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,586 Posts
Discussion Starter #7
low ball idiots. (rick/nick)

The truth

i figured 200 was a fair est. isnt the jrsc good for about 230 crank hp?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,586 Posts
Discussion Starter #10

that looks good, I have a 3" pulley and 10psi /w 42lb injectors so im not sure why tek was sayin under 200
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,366 Posts
u should be around 220 on a dynojet (just quoting from a guy up here in canada with 10 psi, 42lbs) but no headwork or other breather mods
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,586 Posts
Discussion Starter #13
u have a ported head?

nah just SVT /w 42lb, 3" pulley and going to go to a 5.7 crank and 80mm maf
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,586 Posts
Discussion Starter #15
huh? what r u talking about. in his pics it looks like it wass polish not ported thats the question.

oh thought you were asking did i also
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,838 Posts
low ball idiots. (rick/nick)

The truth
Oh, 17/10 off. That's a whole lot better than the 50hp you were off with your last piece of [censored] supercharger setup. Go [censored] yourself with your [censored] junkyard turbo buildup I hear you're doing since your last project failed.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
19,264 Posts
Tekkin... you know better than to come in here with a Mustang Dyno and try and pass that off. Considering the spec'd weight on that dyno is at least 170lbs off... if not more... and we know that Mustangs are very weight dependant... I can tell that the margin of error is high on that dyno.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
1,109 Posts
Got your junk yard right hear rick...sorry i did not buy a car that was built in all aspects and cliam it as my own. I have to be creative instead.

 

·
Registered
Joined
·
502 Posts
[quoteOh, 17/10 off. That's a whole lot better than the 50hp you were off with your last piece of [censored] supercharger setup. Go [censored] yourself with your [censored] junkyard turbo buildup I hear you're doing since your last project failed.

[/QUOTE]

how old r u? y all the censored words. just because he builds f\i motors, and you buy motors that are already boosted, is fair. i think it is a little lazy to me. plus, you do get a little more respect when you build something.

i dont know why your making fun of his last kit, it had alot more thought than you think. so bring what you want, to steeda day. i'll be there, but not boosted at that time. so dont worry about me. i'll have a slowcus.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,838 Posts
Oooooooo all see is an SFL manifold Steven. Where's the creativity? Oh maybe you mean the ridiculous .80A/R on the blower it looks like you're running. Or maybe the crappy MIG welded mild steel piping you're going to run?

And JS, there's a reason why nobody listens to Steven here anymore. He just says mindless drivel all day and anything somewhat intelligent, comes secondhand from either Sam or Jeff.

And why am I making fun of his last kit? Because it was a failure. All day long he was posting here how he was going to run like 17PSI on pump gas and it was going to make 300whp in the meantime telling me how stupid I am with my engine buildup. And it had alot more than I think? I saw the whole kit in person; I know what it had and what it didn't have.

This is the kind of crap I would get from him daily:

Tekin112: why did you edit your first post in rich's motor thread?
Tekin112: blaming it on sams tune?
A 14 1320: yep
Tekin112: there was zero detnation
A 14 1320: i just made a comment about it
A 14 1320: i deleted it becuse i didnt say it to start anything...just making an observation
A 14 1320: figured people who take it the wrong way
A 14 1320: so what happened to the motor?
Tekin112: 3 rod failed
Tekin112: took out 4 when it blew
A 14 1320: so he had a 8 and 10 lb program?
Tekin112: yup
A 14 1320: why not just run the 10 lb program all the time?
Tekin112: there was no deto so that proves the tune was fine
A 14 1320: why did he have 2 programs
A 14 1320: seems kinda close to have 2 different programs
Tekin112: track use
Tekin112: and then a daily driver one
A 14 1320: both used 93?
Tekin112: yup
A 14 1320: well if 10 pounds on 93 was safe, then why not run it all the time?
Tekin112: because he did not want to
A 14 1320: even though it was safe?
Tekin112: and traction was a a huge issue
A 14 1320: then why have the program in the first place if traction was an issue?
Tekin112: 8 was for daily driving
A 14 1320: and 10 at the track
Tekin112: 10 was for track use
A 14 1320: but you said traction sucked at 10
Tekin112: on the street
A 14 1320: so why even have it?
A 14 1320: drags?
Tekin112: because he wanted it
Tekin112: learnign anyhting yet from boosting a stock motor
A 14 1320: so was the 10 lb program tuned for partial throttle at all?
A 14 1320: or just WOT for the track?
Tekin112: sam tunes in 200rpm intervuals
A 14 1320: gotcha
A 14 1320: so what was the difference between the 2 programs?
A 14 1320: since the gas was the same, what had to be changed?
Tekin112: i dont know im not the tuner
Tekin112: boost, a/f, timing, fuel tables
Tekin112: load
A 14 1320: seems like all sam had to do was add the extra load tables from the difference between 8 and 10 lbs
A 14 1320: which doesnt need a seperate program
Tekin112: yes it does
A 14 1320: no
Tekin112: yes, the focus can not tell how mcu hboost its getting
Tekin112: there is no map sensor on the car
A 14 1320: that doesnt matter
A 14 1320: the tune should work at 2 lbs or 7 lbs
A 14 1320: its the same load
A 14 1320: has nothign to do with boost
A 14 1320: if you changed the gas, then you would want to run different timing....but you dont change the gas
Tekin112: engine conditions are totaly different on 8 lbs than 10 lbs
A 14 1320: yeah
A 14 1320: load
A 14 1320: thats all that has to change
A 14 1320: which means just filling in more tables on the original tune
Tekin112: no it does not
A 14 1320: so what has to change then between the 8 and 10 lbs programs?
A 14 1320: because a turbo making 10 pounds of boost makes up to 8 pounds before it makes 9 and 10 pounds...whats the difference in tuning then between the programs? its the same load on the engine...nothing has top change
Tekin112: your gonna live and learn, good luck you will blow your stock motor on booost
A 14 1320: but you didnt answer the question
Tekin112: nothing i answer for you will make you happy so why try

Loser.
 
1 - 20 of 21 Posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top