Ford Focus Forum banner

ZX3 Race Car Turbo Build!! (lots-o-pics)

1 reading
73K views 396 replies 47 participants last post by  2006TZX4  
#1 ·
My '00 ZX3 race car has gone through many forced induction phases over the past couple years. It started with a 177whp JRSC, then last winter I swapped to a PWSC and made 203whp, but this winter I'm doing what I should've done from the very beginning, TURBO! So, this thread will detail my turbo build that will be built/tuned specifically for road racing and hopefully net me at least 325-350Whp in the end.

BUILT BLOCK
Back in late October of '09 I found a great deal on a built Zetec short block via Craigslist. The block was fully built with 8:1 pistons (I think JE brand), Oliver rods and a balanced rotating assembly.

Image


Image


The block had everything I need EXCEPT for ARP main studs. The Oliver rods already have 3/8" ARP 2000 rod bolts so I'm good there. So, I recently picked up a set of ARP main studs and splurged on ARP head studs as well.

Image


Due to the extra clamping force of the ARP main studs (and just to be safe), I'm going to have the main bores line honed with the ARP main studs installed to make sure everything is true. Since the block is going to the machine shop, disassembly was necessary, but this gave me the opportunity to take a closer look at the pistons, rods, crank and bearings used in building the built block. So, what do you think of these pistons, JE brand??

Image


Image


Image


Image


The block is going off to the machine shop in a few weeks, so in the meantime I'm disassembling the previous engine and also doing some mock-up of the manifold, header, etc.

Now, on to the good stuff! Below are the parts being used in the turbo build.

TopSpeed RACE manifold

Image


Turbo
Garrett GT2871R (w/4" anti-surge compressor housing)0.50 A/R anti-surge 4" outlet

Image


The compressor side is currently a 0.50 A/R anti-surge w/4" outlet. The turbine side currently has the 0.64 A/R T25, 5-bolt discharge w/internal wastegate , but I'm going to swap that out for a 0.63 A/R T25 Plus, T25 Inlet Flanged, T31-V Band Outlet Turbine Housing (http://www.atpturbo.com/mm5/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Product_Code=ATP-HSG-042&Category_Code=GTH)

Image


Here's the manifold and turbo mocked up on the old engine:

Image


Intake Manifold
The intake and TB being used are the FRPP intake with the FRPP 70mm throttle body.

Image


Intercooler
400HP Garrett High Density Intercooler Core w/ATP Cast End Tanks and 2.5" inlet/outlet hose connections

Image


Wastegate
Tial MVS 38mm v-band (which will dump to the ground)

Image


Blow-Off Valve
Currently I have a Greddy type-S knock-off, but this will probably be replaced with something different.

Image


Other stuff I've acquired
So far I've also picked up:
- FelPro upper gasket set with stock thickness Zetec head gasket
- FelPro lower end gasket set
- Motorcraft EV111 PCV valve for boosted applications
- Motorcraft replacement timing belt tensioner

Still need to purchase
- Billet timing belt pulley from Gold Coast
- Alternator bracket spacer for FRPP intake from Gold Coast
- Gates blue timing belt from somewhere

Thanks for reading. Comments welcome.
Dan
 
#2 ·
Sweeeet. Great turbo choice, heh....350whp isn't a problem in the slightest. That turbo *wants* to push out that much. Combined with the race mani, FRPP manifold and TB, it will be effortless. Considering the 8:1 compression, I'm thinking ~22psi, which is fine, not overworking the turbo.
 
#4 ·
No boost controller? Doesn't seem like you're on a budget. I recommend the Greddy Type-S along with the steering wheel-mounted button. Run 15 - 20psi in the corners, hit the button to go up to 30psi on the straight and absolutely destroy all the egos of Porsches and such.
 
#6 · (Edited)
No that's the thing....you go through the entire corner on low boost and when you are perfectly straight, you hit the big button. Only for big straights where you can shift you attention. When John would hit his button and jump from 12 to 20 psi it was awesome.
 
#7 ·
sweet build looks like its gonna be a beast ill be watching
 
#12 ·
Well we seem to have a slight clearance issue between the manifold and the t-stat housing.

Image


From that pic it doesn't look too bad, but once the coolant hose is installed there's only ~1/8" of clearance. Obviously my concern is that the heat from the manifold pipe will cause the coolant hose to burst and/or melt the crappy plastic t-stat housing. This would not be a good thing on the track. :eek:
Image


So, my initial thought was to draw up something in AutoCAD and have a local machine shop fab it up. Something similiar to this:
Image


But now I think I'll just get a 3/4"-1" thick piece of aluminum and use it as a spacer. It should be relatively cheap and easy, just cut it to the proper shape and drill the necessary holes. The standard t-stat housing rubber gasket can be used between the housing and spacer and a paper gasket between the spacer and block.
Image


Thoughts? Comments? Suggestions?
 
#13 ·
If there is clearance between the two, honestly you shouldn't have a problem, as long as its not touching. We have ran them for extended periods of time without have a problem with standard rubber radiator lines. Most of the time when you have things melt in an engine bay it is from contacting the manifold, not radiant heat from the manifold.

With that being said, I have never been fond of the stock thermostat housing. Something like this would be more ideal of course, also a spacer like you talk about would also help:

Image
 
#14 ·
If there is clearance between the two, honestly you shouldn't have a problem, as long as its not touching. We have ran them for extended periods of time without have a problem with standard rubber radiator lines. Most of the time when you have things melt in an engine bay it is from contacting the manifold, not radiant heat from the manifold.

With that being said, I have never been fond of the stock thermostat housing. Something like this would be more ideal of course, also a spacer like you talk about would also help:
Thanks for the info. I agree that the radiant heat probably would not cause any issues, but I tend to over build everything since track time is so expensive. I think I'm going to space it out with some 6061 aluminum plate. Of course then I open myself up to another opportunity for a coolant leak.

I'm not a huge fan of the stock t-stat housing either. There are a couple active threads on that subject now, so hopefully something better will come out of those discussions. I like the HTP replacement unit but the price is too rich for my blood.
 
#15 ·
if the car is being build for the track why even bother running a t-stat?! it's not like you really need to worry about "warm-up" at the track, rather cooling!
i'd just build an outlet with no t-stat and call it a day!

Nice build so far!
 
#17 ·
if the car is being build for the track why even bother running a t-stat?! it's not like you really need to worry about "warm-up" at the track, rather cooling!
i'd just build an outlet with no t-stat and call it a day!

Nice build so far!
Thx! If I go without a t-stat would you suggest running some type of coolant flow restrictor disc to slow the coolant flow somewhat?
 
#19 ·
Bryan, you might notice who's old manifold that its is. :)


Dan, it's nice to see that you are starting on the build finally. I got the powerworks all up and running and found out that my o2 sensor was bad. :(

Oh as far as your boost controller. Look into the E-boost2 controller. It is very nice in its programmable to your needs. There are a few others they offer too. These were what i was looking into.

http://www.turbosmartonline.com/index.php?id=42
 
#23 ·
Bryan, you might notice who's old manifold that its is. :)


Dan, it's nice to see that you are starting on the build finally. I got the powerworks all up and running and found out that my o2 sensor was bad. :(

Oh as far as your boost controller. Look into the E-boost2 controller. It is very nice in its programmable to your needs. There are a few others they offer too. These were what i was looking into.

[URL]http://www.turbosmartonline.com/index.php?id=42[/URL]
Steven, Glad to know the PWSC is working well for you. I'm stoked to get this turbo kit up and going but I need to wait for my tax refund and bonus from work before purchasing any more parts and dropping the block off at the machine shop. Until then I'm just mocking up and making a list of everything I'll need. I'll check out the E-boost2, thx.

Too much coin for me, plus it doesn't move the coolant hose any farther away from the manifold tube. I've been paying close attention to "Tousley Steve's" t-stat housing thread. Seems that he has found a better one piece unit from the Contour.

I wouldn't run without some sort of restriction like the thermostat. I've had problems in the past cooling cars after removing the thermostat.
I agree and was looking at the following. Now the question is which size restrictor to use.

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/MOR-63440/
 
#25 ·
Thermostats (or at least some restriction like a properly sized washer) is necessary to maintain a higher pressure inside the engine, and slow down the flow for increased heat transfer efficiency. Cooling ability is decreased when the tstat is removed.

Also, unless you never plan on driving in cold weather, I strongly suggest leaving a thermostat in. Stable coolant temps help fuel mileage, reliability, etc.
 
#31 ·
Where I'm from, the 'season' is from February through December, with several of those days in the teens and twenties :thumbup:


And you could spray an intercooler with C02, which would not leak fluids on the track.
 
#33 ·
once a Tstat is open, the WP is pretty much flowing coolant as fast as the engine will push it. removing a T-stat doesn't make a huge difference in the heat transfer in the rad only the heat absorption inside the block and head. ultimately you have built in restrictions in the system in the forms of the inlet and outlet on the block/head and of course the rad. adding in a restrictor somewhere can maked a difference.

the easiest thing to do is just remove it and see.
most race cars we run with up here have no Tstats and do not have issues with overheating due to lack of time in the engine or block
 
#29 ·
Dan, are you able to run a intercooler spray kit in the class you run in? If so, look into it cause it could help out a little bit.
 
#30 ·
With the exception of standard safety equipment/rules and having to run DOT-approved r-comp tires, my class is virtually unlimited. Since an intercooler sprayer has the opportunity to drop fluid on the track that might be an exception to the 'unlimited' rule. However, I have a Snow WMI kit that I'm planning on running for lower IATs. WMI should do equally as well, if not better, than an intercooler sprayer.

Speaking of intercoolers..... This past Saturday I found a Garrett 400hp intercooler on Craigslist, so I took a short drive and picked that puppy up. It was BRAND NEW and nearly half the cost of retail. That should help! :thumbup:
 
#32 ·
nice build u got goin here bro, but i got a question..

BY - Billet timing belt pulley from Gold Coast

U mean the guide/idler pulley correct?
 
#34 ·
Those should be nice pistons and rods for the combination you're running. Both companies make quality components.

On the thermostat I'd probably run one if it were myself but before deciding what's best for your car you may want to consider the type and length of racing you'll be doing. Without a t-stat the car will probably take quite a bit longer to warm up which might not be a problem if you're doing some extended race intervals and can idle the car for extended periods at startup, but if the engine can't get up to temp quickly before racing it could accelerate wear, cause elevated oil pressure, etc. Also consider the engine management being used and how it will affect tuning if the temps run low.
 
#36 ·
On the t-stat subject..... My races are anywhere fron 20-45 minutes in length, so keeping heat in the engine isn't a problem at all. I also have the ability to let the car warm up sufficiently while on the false grid.

I dunno, I'm still on the fence about this one, as I see pros & cons in both directions. :dunno: