Ford Focus Forum banner

2010 Ford Taurus SHO (official pics)

7.1K views 81 replies 29 participants last post by  Osiris  
#1 · (Edited)
http://www.autoblog.com/2009/02/11/officially-official-2010-ford-taurus-sho/

Image


The SHO must go on. SHO me the money. It's SHO time!

We've heard them all during the months of speculation leading up to this moment. Without further ado, we present to you the 2010 Ford Taurus SHO. That's right, Ford has decided to revive the moniker once affixed to the sports sedan that wowed the automotive world way back in 1989. The original SHO survived three generations of Taurus models, was sold for 10 years straight and attracted over 100,000 buyers. But just as the Taurus itself devolved from America's best-selling car to a rental fleet afterthought, the original SHO ended production in 1999 having gone from a budget sports sedan to an overpriced, underpowered executive whip.

Ford is working on rehabilitating the Taurus name with a significant redesign that debuted last month at the Detroit Auto Show. Using that sedan as its canvas, the new SHO may also restore respect to a name that has fallen too far. A 365-hp twin-turbo EcoBoost V6, all-wheel-drive and plenty of upgrades is a good place to start. Follow the jump to learn everything there is to know about the return of the SHO.

Ford is currently in the process of stuffing its new 3.5L EcoBoost V6 into any that fits. The Ford Flex, Lincoln MKS and upcoming Lincoln MKT are all getting it. Being based on the same platform as the MKS, it was a no-brainer that the redesigned 2010 Taurus would also get the twin-turbo, direct-inject engine that Ford promises will deliver V8 power with V6 fuel economy. Rather than simply affix the EcoBoost badge to the Taurus' trunk and call it a day, Ford product planners decided that this model would be the perfect vehicle to once again wear the letters S-H-O.

That model designation originally meant Super High Output, which definitely applies to the modern version. Whereas the original SHO used a high-revving 220-hp 3.0L V6 (later a 235-hp 3.4L V8) developed and built by Yamaha, the new SHO's advanced engine turns a relatively small 3.5 liters of displacement displacement and a lot of pressure into 365 horsepower at 5,500 rpm and 350 ft.-lb of torque at 3,500 rpm. That makes this version of Ford's 3.5L EcoBoost V6 the most powerful one available with 10 more horsepower than its other applications.

Unlike the original SHO, however, this new one is about much more than just the engine. Backing up the potent powerplant is a torque-sensing all-wheel-drive system mated to Ford's 6F55 six-speed SelectShift automatic transmission. The tranny is augmented by a manual mode that can be controlled either by the console shifter or paddle shifters, and will also rev match downshifts and hold gears even when the tach is bouncing off the engine's redline.

The SHO further separates itself from lesser Taurus models with a beefed up suspension that includes SHO-specific shock absorbers, springs, stabilizer bars and strut mount bushings. Furthermore, the new SHO also features Ford's new SR1 suspension setup with MacPherson front struts and a multi-link set up in the rear. We'll have to wait for a test drive to determine for sure, but the SHO's suspension should be noticeably sharper than that of the standard Taurus and its other platform-mate, the Lincoln MKS. There will even be an optional Performance Package that includes better brake pads, recalibrated steering, a "Sport Mode" for the stability control system and shorter 3.16 to 1 final drive ratio. Nineteen-inch wheels wrapped in Goodyear Eagle rubber will be standard, while 20-inchers wearing Michelin high-performance summer tires will also be available.

New wheels are one of only a few items that will visually set the SHO apart from lesser Taurus trim levels. The grille features a dark grey finish that matches the wheels and new parking lamp bevels are SHO-only items. There's also a decklid spoiler out back along with a simple SHO/EcoBoost badge on the trunk lid. One of the exclusive colors available will also be Atlantis Green, which Ford says was inspired by the Deep Emerald Green seen on many second-generation (1992-1995) SHO models.

While the exterior styling adheres to the same sleeper philosophy as the original, the new SHO interior is a bit more outgoing. The seats are leather-trimmed and two-tone with Mike Suede inserts, which Ford proudly points out are produced from post-consumer yarns made of plastic soda bottles. The dash and door panels also feature acres of aluminum trim, and SHO branding appears on the floor mats and passenger-side dash panel.

Those are basically the lengths to which Ford has gone to transform its new Taurus into a modern day interpretation of the original SHO. There is some bad news, however, some of which will likely not go over well with the SHO faithful who live on websites like SHOtimes.com, SHOforum.com and BringBackTheSHO.com, and who Ford also claims it listened to during the car's development.

For one, the original Yamaha 3.0L V6 (upper left) was one of the most gorgeous engines ever created with an overlapping system of intake runners that is a marvel to behold. The 3.5L EcoBoost V6 in the new version (upper right) is covered by a boring, black plastic shroud with SHO branding. Also, aside from the aforementioned availability of a SHO-inspired shade of green, there's not much that visually connects the new car to the original. Though the first- and second-gen SHOs did not look drastically different than a standard Taurus, there were certain SHO elements that have become associated with the car, specifically the "slicer" wheels that debuted in '90/'91 and were standard on all second-gen models.



Then there's the question of whether another Ford product might have been a more appropriate choice for a modern day SHO. The Fusion, for instance, is smaller, lighter and less expensive than the current Taurus. While the redesigned 2010 Fusion does offer a Sport model with a big V6, we envision a more balanced Fusion SHO that honors the original with front-wheel-drive, a manual transmission and high output 2.0L EcoBoost four-cylinder. It might be nice, but it's not the way Ford went.

The 2010 Ford Taurus SHO will start at $37,995 when it goes on sale this summer. That's a lofty price tag for a Taurus, but not for a 365-hp, all-wheel-drive sedan stuffed with this much tech and luxury. The original SHO stickered for just under $20,000 in late 1988, which was also considered a big premium to pay for Ford's bread-and-butter family sedan. But auto pundits of the day quickly realized that the SHO was a performance bargain compared to more expensive cars from brands like BMW. Based on what we've learned so far, the same thing will likely be said of the new one.
 
#3 ·
Gotta love the lack of the clutch pedal. Also 10 more hp than the other "eco" boosts!!! Crazy. Seems more power tourer than sporty. :dunno:

I wish it was a Taurus GT, and not a SHO...

However, very nice interior and fit and finish, definitely a step in the right direction for Ford. I can't wait for that motor in the Mustang!
 
#4 ·
It's a nice, clean looking car. I can't wait to hear how it performs on the road. A little bigger power boost to differentiate the SHO from other EcoBoost-equipped vehicles would have been nice, but if it has good chassis dynamics and doesn't drive like an oversized somewhat-sporty land yacht it would be a compelling large car. The sticker price is a little on the high side so hopefully we can get the SHO and a high performance variant of the Fusion down the road. There's no reason they couldn't sell both.
 
#5 ·
As a former GenII and GenIII SHO owner, I would have wished for Ford to mod the Fusion instead as well, and to me it looks like Ford went the way of the GenIII and made another executive express. I'm sure this car will perform well, but I was really hoping for a lighter, more dedicated sports sedan like the GenI and II.

Nonetheless, this is certainly a very nice car, and I'm glad Ford is going to offer it. It certainly does appear that Ford has decided to offer more than just the Mustang as its performance option.
 
#6 ·
I never thought I would fall in love with a Taurus again, but the new SHO is very good looking! I liked the first and second gen SHO's, and now the 4th gen. A couple of years ago I would have said there would be no way Ford could build any car that is good looking again, I was wrong, this thing is perfect! Now that Ford has good looking products again, which have been lacking for the past few years, it is time to get the economy better so people will actually buy things again.
 
#7 ·
I love it. A Fusion SHO would be nice but I love this car. Price tag is a bit much though.
 
#9 ·
I am normally against slush boxes, but with the Taurus SHO, it would be ok. It is not a race car, or even a sports car, its a fun way to get to work with enough room to take people out for lunch. You won't find one autocrossing, but that is not the point of the car.
 
#10 ·
Unless it just happens to mask it's weight well and does okay on an auto-x. :D

I would love to have the option of a manual but since there aren't any other cars on the same platform to pull one from the development costs would be high. That and the GM-Ford designed slushbox probably has a higher torque capacity than most of the five and six-speed manuals (especially in a car that weighs that much, which affects the load capacity on a trans). If I recall correctly for example, Getrag only has a couple transaxles that are rated just north of 400n-M (~300 ft-lbs) and that rating is for vehicles with less mass. Perhaps I'm getting older but in my luxury/full size family sedan I wouldn't mind a good (emphasis on good) automatic. For smaller raw performance cars I'd always choose a stick but in this application I might pass it up.
 
#14 ·
Reedicus26 said:
Gotta love the lack of the clutch pedal. Also 10 more hp than the other "eco" boosts!!! Crazy. Seems more power tourer than sporty. :dunno:

I wish it was a Taurus GT, and not a SHO...

However, very nice interior and fit and finish, definitely a step in the right direction for Ford. I can't wait for that motor in the Mustang!
how many manual old SHO have u seen?:what:
 
#15 ·
I'm with CheckMyVitals (again i kno:lol:)

WIN

I wanted a lil more aggressive but I think they are gonna steal a lot of buyers from other companies like Nissan and such. Great neutrual styling yet still edgy in its own way. Power is awesome and I like the introduction of the SPORT mode. Its gonna be a show stopper with 20inchers, definitely.

And IT LOOKS 1000X BETTER THAN THE TL, and Acura lovers will agree. While not really competing, maybe the Mercury/Linoln version will steal them away.



-chris
 
#17 ·
CrUziN4L said:
I'm with CheckMyVitals (again i kno:lol:)

WIN

I wanted a lil more aggressive but I think they are gonna steal a lot of buyers from other companies like Nissan and such. Great neutrual styling yet still edgy in its own way. Power is awesome and I like the introduction of the SPORT mode. Its gonna be a show stopper with 20inchers, definitely.

And IT LOOKS 1000X BETTER THAN THE TL, and Acura lovers will agree. While not really competing, maybe the Mercury/Linoln version will steal them away.



-chris
There will not Mercury version of this car, and the MKS will not get a dual clutch or manumatic.
 
#18 ·
wilko said:
There will not Mercury version of this car, and the MKS will not get a dual clutch or manumatic.
i mean in general to the taurus, their will be....it could be intersting how Acura now looks at their design vs. sales.
 
#20 ·
I am glad it is not overly aggresive with a bunch of stuck on scoops, vents, and other stuff the designers took from some kids Civic. The SHO is very grown up and adult. Overall, the new Taurus is one of the best looking sedans on the market. I don't even like sedans, but I really like the new Taurus. Things could have been much worse, they could have stuck a 2 foot tall chrome fake vent on the fenders next to the door, installed some 15" wheels, borrowed the interior from a mid 90's neon, tacked on layers of body cladding, and called it done. The new SHO is classy, upscale, and mature while not looking boring or blending into the sea of sedans out there.
 
#21 ·
wilko said:
So this time around SHO means, Slightly Higher Output. This car only gets a 10HP bump from the other Eco boosted V6's. I think Taurus GT or ST would be better, IMO. Other than that, it is nice.
I *think* that it is more around 100hp, assuming the standard Taurus doesn't get any EcoBoosted V6... which I don't expect that it will.

365hp is... a LOT of horsepower.

I think the fact that this car is official AND is being named what the enthusiasts ask for is really too good to be true.
 
#22 · (Edited)
Random Select said:
meh. I'd take a G8 GXP over the Taurus SHO any day of the week. The G8 GXP has way better styling then the Taurus.
yeh and the idea of Pontaic being next in line for a 21gun solute really makes me want a G8 also:what:


and it being RWD, doesn't really compete with this....more like BMWs/Mercedes, and that only competes in performance. (overall quality, interior, etc...BMW/Mercedes kills the G8)
 
#23 ·
For $38k, the car needs to look the part. If someone had showed me a pic of this car, I'd never guess it was the SHO. It looks like an upper trim level car...like an SES or something. It definitely has no sporting aspirations built into the aesthetics.

This car does make the G8 look like a performance bargain by comparison.
 
#24 ·
CrUziN4L said:
yeh and the idea of Pontaic being next in line for a 21gun solute really makes me want a G8 also:what:


and it being RWD, doesn't really compete with this....more like BMWs/Mercedes, and that only competes in performance. (overall quality, interior, etc...BMW/Mercedes kills the G8)
Well if you want to bring in the Euro cars, then I'd take a 3-Series or 5-Series over the SHO. :)

I was just never a Taurus fan I guess.
 
#25 ·
I'm not so worried about Pontiac getting axed as much as GM closing up shop, both of which wouldn't be a determining factor in buying a car. While the G8 and Charger may be in the same "full size sedan" class I think the new SHO from the looks is going more upscale and luxurious while the others are more sporting and probably appeal to different crowds. Hard to say, but if the SHO does handle and performance as well as the rear drive car it would be a tough decision.

A couple other random related tangents, I saw a few comments on Autoblog complaining about the term "eco" in EcoBoost. I don't know if it's just me, but if the Taurus is like the Flex and the turbo V6 gets the exact same mileage but produces over 100 hp more than the naturally aspirated engine I'd say that's impressive. The types who do complain are apparently not car people and probably complain why the base engine doesn't do better.

I also bet it's likely they're using the new Haldex Generation 4 cross-wheel drive (XWD) system but will have to wait to see if that gets confirmed. The Volvo cars have been using the Generation 3 system (along with VAG and other automakers) and the new gen 4 system is a lot better for performance applications. It's a preemptive system and can use an electric pump to pre-charge the rear drive coupling and doesn't have to experience slip before it will send power to the rear. That would mean there's a good chance Ford could dial in some rear bias so that it launches like a rear drive car.

The Saab 9-3 Turbo X was the first to use the new system and worked with Haldex on development in Sweden. There's more info on the system here. If the SHO does get the gen 4 setup it would be really great if they also implement the eLSD which can actively bias torque between the rear wheels.
 
#26 · (Edited)
Random Select said:
Well if you want to bring in the Euro cars, then I'd take a 3-Series or 5-Series over the SHO. :)

I was just never a Taurus fan I guess.
not bringing in anything random here.... saying the G8 GXP really has no comparison to a AWD car in general. The G8 GXP is a RWDperformance oriented car, and its awesome...but compares to the RWD models of its segment, those from BMW/MERC/etc.

u can definitely compare the BMW/MERC AWD models to this, thats valid.