Well, you guys wanted some independant aerocharger results. Here you are then.
I went and had mine run on a Mustang 250 dynomometer. A Mustang chassis dyno is load based as opposed to a Dynojet which is inertia based. For a good discussion of the two please read this document from the Rennsport (Porsche) mailing list, where some of the Porsche engineers discuss the particularities of various dyno systems. Anyhow, the most important part is that Mustang chassis dynos read about 5-7% lower then a dynojet unit. Also Mustang dynos do not show no gains from things like lightweight flywheels and underdrive pulleys.
So then consider this graph:
Clicking on it will take you to a slightly larger version. As you can see my car put out 201.7whp@5500rpm and 202.4wtq@4000rpm. On a dynojet with the UDP and flywheel showing up these would probably be close to 220. Pretty solid numbers.
Those of you familiar with the aerocharger kits will notice that my torque figures are low for a stage III. I belive this is because I am only making 8psi in 4th gear for some reason. This is odd to me because I am 100% certain I am getting 10psi in 3rd and 2nd. As soon as I am done posting here I am going to go take a drive and check out 4th. This could be because my turbo has a slightly different spring/shim on it to compensate for the slight additional backpressure from the 2.25" exhaust.
Mods for this dyno are:
Aerocharger Turbo 10psi@2750, 8psi@6000
Iceman Cold Air Intake Front Section Only With Stock Airbox/Filter
MBRP 2.25" Exhaust
FocusSport 4-1 race header
Esslinger Cam Gears (0/0)
Esslinger Underdrive Pulley
FocusSport 9lb Flywheel
Clutchmasters Stage III Clutch
Quaife Automatic Torque Biasing Differential
I have some other comments regarding the Quaife+dyno and why there is no A/F graph
however ill add those in later.
------------------
Black 00' ZX3 5spd
Mods
"No Fear?..... Not Fast Enough!"

I went and had mine run on a Mustang 250 dynomometer. A Mustang chassis dyno is load based as opposed to a Dynojet which is inertia based. For a good discussion of the two please read this document from the Rennsport (Porsche) mailing list, where some of the Porsche engineers discuss the particularities of various dyno systems. Anyhow, the most important part is that Mustang chassis dynos read about 5-7% lower then a dynojet unit. Also Mustang dynos do not show no gains from things like lightweight flywheels and underdrive pulleys.
So then consider this graph:

Clicking on it will take you to a slightly larger version. As you can see my car put out 201.7whp@5500rpm and 202.4wtq@4000rpm. On a dynojet with the UDP and flywheel showing up these would probably be close to 220. Pretty solid numbers.

Those of you familiar with the aerocharger kits will notice that my torque figures are low for a stage III. I belive this is because I am only making 8psi in 4th gear for some reason. This is odd to me because I am 100% certain I am getting 10psi in 3rd and 2nd. As soon as I am done posting here I am going to go take a drive and check out 4th. This could be because my turbo has a slightly different spring/shim on it to compensate for the slight additional backpressure from the 2.25" exhaust.
Mods for this dyno are:
Aerocharger Turbo 10psi@2750, 8psi@6000
Iceman Cold Air Intake Front Section Only With Stock Airbox/Filter
MBRP 2.25" Exhaust
FocusSport 4-1 race header
Esslinger Cam Gears (0/0)
Esslinger Underdrive Pulley
FocusSport 9lb Flywheel
Clutchmasters Stage III Clutch
Quaife Automatic Torque Biasing Differential
I have some other comments regarding the Quaife+dyno and why there is no A/F graph

------------------
Black 00' ZX3 5spd
Mods
"No Fear?..... Not Fast Enough!"